SENT (SENT)

it's rare to see an ai project that feels like it belongs both in academic circles and in crypto spaces. that's @sentientagi $SENT after reading their docs, a question popped: what if agi doesn't emerge from one giant model, but from coordination across thousands of smaller ones? their whole design is built around that assumption. i made 🧵 to explain in simple terms what they're building, here's what you'll read about: → what sentient is → how the grid actually works → how builders, users, & stakers fit in → $sent economy ▫️what sentient is sentient is building the GRID, an open agi network made from many small intelligences working together. this idea hit me fast while reading the docs. agi here isn't a single mega model. it's hundreds of artifacts - models, agents, tools, data sources - all stitched into workflows when a user asks something. each artifact does one job well. sentient chat pulls them together on the fly so the user gets a final result that feels like a unified mind. the grid already has 100+ partners, plus in-house components like dobby, deep search, fingerprinting libraries... ▫️how the grid actually works the grid is basically the supply side - a global pool of artifacts contributed by builders. users jump in through sentient chat, which routes every request across different artifacts. a workflow may call a model, then a search tool, then an agent sequence, depending on what's needed. builders plug in their artifacts & get instant distribution w/ zero marketing. if their artifact gets used, they earn revenue + token rewards. i kept asking myself: how do you make an ai network like this self-sustain? the answer kept showing up in the next layer - the economy. ▫️how builders, users, & stakers fit in the docs split participants into clear groups ↓ • artifacts • reps • stakers • users each plays a different role inside emissions & governance. ▫️artifacts artifacts earn the biggest share of emissions. the network scores them based on↓ • revenue share • stake weight • reputation vote a formula combines these signals so high-value artifacts rise naturally. ▫️reps reps are dao-elected stewards who vote on governance & help decide emission shares. they also earn rewards based on stake & a fixed fee. ▫️stakers token holders can stake in 2 ways↓ • stake on artifacts to earn part of their emissions • stake on reps to delegate voting power longer lock duration increases staking weight. ▫️users users of apps built on sentient - like sentient chat - also receive a piece of emissions. this is meant to reward activity & keep the ecosystem alive. ▫️$sent economy $sent acts on 3 loops↓ • payment • staking • emission each payment rewards artifact builders & stakers. each stake sends a signal of which artifacts matter. each emission cycle redistributes $SENT to the contributors who actually create value. their docs keep repeating 1 point in different places: the network adapts based on usage, revenue, staking signals, & expert voting. this is how they try to make the grid self-curating instead of manually curated. it's a whole different take on agi - not building a giant brain, but connecting many smaller ones w/ economics keeping the system aligned. that was the part that surprised me most.. and yeah, i started rooting for them ✌️ retweet this to your network and help others get to know the project and follow @raares cause i'll be covering more of it soon

Pre market signals put sentient’s $SENT around a $1.6B FDV Prediction markets are leaning lower closer to $800M–$1B after launch. But liquidity on Polymarket is thin (~$77K). That’s not enough to treat the current pricing as truth. With real volume something near $500K the curve would actually mean something. Prediction markets are becoming the new meta for early valuations. If you’re tracking launches, you can’t ignore them anymore.

77k on polymarket is tiny, def can’t treat that as a reliable signal tbh but i do think $SENT could hit big numbers nevertheless btw we could see @sentientagi tge soon https://t.co/odxBKxvMBP

considering, i literally get mindshare but don't get yaps anymore, should i still be yapping about @SentientAGI? TGE wen? https://t.co/k7hj67l6ZD

🚀 Looking forward to this week's Sentient-wide AMA and the “blockbuster” TGE. The market is warming up. Sentient Chinese community moderator @Miles082510 also conveyed the latest project updates to the community last night, as shown below: ​It is clear that the Sentient team has done extensive preparation for the TGE and hopes to get answers during the AMA. For example: ▪️ Why didn't the DC submitted in November receive a role, and why isn’t it just a few days away? ▪️ Why hasn't the token economics been released yet? ▪️ How many DC community roles and Yap allocations are there? ▪️ What are the Yap snapshot rules, especially the recent tweets asking everyone to keep Yapping—are there multiple snapshots? ​ ​I personally feel that the team is generous with the community, especially now they have started reviewing contributions from community members whose Twitter accounts were blocked. This approach is really heart‑warming and shows genuine respect for the community. The most exciting part is the “blockbuster” TGE. Previously @sandeepnailwal also said something similar; I recall the last project that used similar wording was Sea Lion, which reignited the community’s dormant enthusiasm. So, can we further look forward to the airdrop share? Previously the estimated DC role share was 0.25% and Yap leaderboard 0.27%; doubling those to DC 0.5% and Yap 0.5% would truly deserve a “blockbuster” TGE. Of course, if the community airdrop matches or exceeds the recent community airdrop ceiling set by Monad at 3.3%, that would be even better. ​ ​Finally, I hope Sentient becomes the flame that melts the bear‑market snow, reviving confidence in top‑tier projects, the AI track, Polygon‑related projects, and the airdrop track. @SentientAGI @sentient_zh

🔥 Sentient token economics – any positive news before the TGE? Are ICO rumors true? It’s Wednesday. Can we finally see the much‑awaited @SentientAGI token economics? If the TGE is around December 7, we should hear an announcement this week. If not, it’s likely delayed. The project originally told investors the TGE would be in November, now it’s pushed to after December 7. The community hasn’t received any useful information these past few days; the team is keeping things very tight. In this scenario, either the airdrop will be massive, or it will be a disappointment. I lean toward the latter: Sentient likely still has a lot of positive news unreleased—rumored follow‑on financing, upcoming new products, partnerships with Asia‑Pacific banks and large enterprises… Once verified, these positives would boost pre‑market price and solidify consensus. Looking at $SENT’s pre‑market price, which has stayed between 1.5B‑2B, the team appears to be market‑making. Under these conditions, price support is solid, suggesting the team has intentions regarding the listing price. Regarding the recent rumor that an ICO might follow the delayed TGE, I think the chances are low. Previously, the team even cancelled the FDV 1.2 KOL round financing. This move shows they have ample funds and prefer to tightly control token circulation—an ICO would contradict that strategy. In any case, the registration deadline is near; keep posting daily updates, and maybe a surprise will appear. @SentientAGI @sentient_zh

neural nets + AGI infra + 2x vs Gemini? that ROMA stat alone is wild Dec 4 + Dec 7 look like real catalysts here for @SentientAGI not just hype 4 papers at #NeurIPS is serious mindshare position before TGE or watch from sidelines

.@SentientAGI guy dming ppl to keep yapping for alloca painful to watch teams force the narrative. u can’t compete with projects where the community is having fun posting isn’t work when u are in the flow. but begging in dms kills the vibe https://t.co/ZaZ4GB6BfY