Luna by Virtuals (LUNA)

Reminder $LUNA https://t.co/YaiTU9LigN

Do you all see this scenario as correct? If so, which case does it resemble? I remember it well because it wiped out my account, that is:

$LUNA once rose to $120 with a market cap over $100 billion!

So how far will the Sayor pump go? When it loses its peg, that marks the explosion profit‑taking phase that ends the large Bitcoin cycle.

As for altcoins it's unclear, but I'm hoping that after the meme rally, the large‑cap coins will rise a bit with this rebound wave.

Then whether BTC keeps rising or sells in May, we'll calculate further from there!

A company with only 3,500 employees earns more from trading than the world’s largest banks, and this extreme lead raises questions that go far beyond pure performance.

We are talking about Jane Street, which is not an ordinary market maker.

The firm employs about 3,500 people and, according to Reuters, generated $39.6 billion in net trading revenue in 2025.

That puts JPMorgan behind in the trading business despite a much larger staff. Per head, that equals more than $11 million in revenue.

The core of the business is market making. Jane Street trades primarily with its own capital rather than client money. The firm posts prices, takes the opposite side of many transactions, and in some segments is so large that it not only provides liquidity but also shapes market structure.

That is exactly where the problem begins.

In India, the securities regulator SEBI accused Jane Street in 2025 of trading bank stocks and index derivatives on expiration days in a way that distorted index levels.

The regulator estimated the alleged illegal profits at about $567 million. Jane Street denies wrongdoing and called the strategies arbitrage.

At the same time, Jane Street is under pressure in the U.S. because of Terraform Labs. The bankruptcy trustee filed a lawsuit claiming Jane Street used non‑public information surrounding the Terra Luna collapse.

These accusations are still allegations and not court findings.

The pattern is interesting. An extremely profitable trading firm sits at central nodes of modern markets, trades at enormous speed, uses complex derivatives, and operates in areas where outsiders see only a part of the positions.

13F filings show long positions in US stocks and ETFs, but they do not reveal the full derivatives book, all shorts, or the total economic exposure. Therefore, a visible billion‑dollar position in an ETF can be harmless, a hedge, or part of a much larger strategy.

The open question is therefore not whether Jane Street manipulated everywhere.

The stronger question is whether regulators have enough transparency to timely detect when market making at firms of this size turns into market power.