Mask Network (MASK)

⚡ Flash News 🌍 Mask Network takes leadership in Lens @MaskNetwork announced that it becomes the new steward of the Lens Community, focusing on driving decentralized social towards mass adoption.

Mask Network announced it has stepped in as the new steward of LC (Lens Community), aiming to bring decentralized social to the mainstream. Building on the open, permissionless infrastructure developed by the Lens community, Mask plans to focus on user-facing products, creator economies, and community growth, with MaskDAO-backed apps such as Orb Club and Firefly already active in the ecosystem. https://t.co/QHbugUvehV

Mask Network announced that it has officially become the new steward of LC (Lens Community), and will work together to advance decentralized social media into the mainstream. Mask stated that its team has long been building a bridge from Web2 to Web3 social platforms and has supported decentralized social ecosystems such as Mastodon; in the future, it will focus on more user‑friendly products and community culture building on the open, permissionless infrastructure already established in the Lens community. Mask also mentioned that products under MaskDAO, including Orb Club and Firefly, which target creators and communities, have already been deployed in the ecosystem. https://t.co/Ik6RnNt4Wf

Over the years, we have built some of the most important onchain financial primitives. We later expanded that ambition to social primitives that users truly own. We built the Lens Protocol and its underlying onchain rails, including state-of-the-art decentralized data storage for content, governed by smart contracts. Our goal was to create neutral social infrastructure that developers could rely on to build consumer-grade applications capable of reaching mainstream users. Today, stewardship of Lens transitions to @masknetwork, builders of Orb, and a team focused on advancing Lens at the application layer. Lens social primitives will always remain open source and will forever serve as infrastructure for anyone building social applications on decentralized rails. Our team will continue as technical advisors, while we continue to innovate on what has always been our core expertise: DeFi.

🫡 Keep building, the future of decentralized social is ahead. 💯 https://t.co/oV4BrDJqoM

Am i the only one who's not farming $MASK? https://t.co/AvBsJL2Vje

If you have followed me and witnessed painting MANYU, MASK, HOUSECOIN, URANUS, UDSUC, TROLL, and WOJAK etc; but still don’t think the trenches are an actual fugazi of KOL bundles using liquid and influence for power, you cannot be saved Programmed

"Love seeing opensea becoming a hub for third-party rewards" me too 😉

Introducing @MetaMask new milking machine. Now you can earn gems 💎😂 This company has absolutely zero value towards users and community, all in the name of $MASK airdrop. Tbh, i dont use Metamask at all. Slow and bad UI 🤧 https://t.co/mMGGX1rPhD

Extreme Mispricing on $MASK FDV Polymarket = Opportunity. With the start of 2026, many markets with 2025 deadlines concluded, but with events that haven't occurred yet. These markets restart, sometimes mispricing emerges at the beginning with low trading volume = an opportunity to profit. One of these markets is "Metamask FDV ABOVE… ONE DAY AFTER LAUNCH": https://t.co/RKmOyKxpyC I've placed bets on "NO" outcomes from $700M to $4B FDV. My account: https://t.co/v5xUQVoGVD Let's break down the main reasons for betting on "NO" outcomes. - $700M and $1B FDV - these are risky bets if you judge by competitors - Trust Wallet $TWT currently has FDV of ~$0.9B. But I'm not betting on the FDV itself, but rather that $Mask won't launch in 2026 and the market will resolve to "NO". If it succeeds, that's potential 5x profit. Consensys (the developer of Metamask) is known for regular delays, which is evident almost all the time. The same $LINEA token was anticipated for years despite all the "SOON" promises. - $4B, $3B, $2B FDV - in my view, relatively safe. From highest to lowest, they'll yield 10%, 20%, and 25% profit respectively. Why are they safe? 1. One of the main competitors with a trading token on the market is $TWT, which in its entire 5-year existence had FDV > $2B for only 1 month (in 2022). Although, as everyone knows, Trust Wallet has direct support from @binance and @cz_binance 2. Weak community support for Consensys. The $Linea token launched in September 2025 is already trading down -75% from TGE price. The main reason is the sale of 3.88% of Total $Linea Supply by insiders (Linea Consortium), despite public statements about the absence of token allocations for insiders and selling pressure from them. On top of that, Native Yield as well as liquidity initiation from SBET, which they used to attract retail investors - has been severely delayed. All of this, combined together, has undermined community trust and is the main reason for poor sentiment around Consensys among retail - which will undoubtedly affect demand for the $Mask token. If there's an airdrop where at least 5-10% goes to retail - already on the second day the token price will be below the launch price. A $2B FDV looks unattainable under these conditions. The downside of this market is the uncertain resolution timeline. I don't want to keep my deposit frozen for a year - I'm planning to set limit sell orders in advance. I'll write about that separately. On which outcomes will you bet?