AI Real-time Tweet Analysis
Detect Market Pulse

I’ll be honest: the @HeyElsaAI app experience was good, BUT TGE -> trash At the beginning, I swap ETH to stables, and then I just moved stables → ETH → stables trying the product, and somehow ELSA managed to eat ~$1,000 in fees/gas along the way. Death by a thousand clicks... Then right at TGE, they drop this nonsense (stating swap stables or eth to stables and points gets no allocation) If I don’t get at least 10% those fees back in $ELSA, I genuinely don’t care anymore. I’ll FUD it all I want. This felt like getting farmed, not “using a product.” Guess what, in the end i got 1 elsa token, which is 0.09. so my return of investment is negative negative negative. I like Base. I want Base apps to win... But this? This is just bad move+ bad incentives. Also yes, I was yapping on their Wallchain post,not because I believed, but because the multiplier. Turns out that’s a great way to get played. Anyway, thanks ELSA. Had loads of fun burning fees for vibes 👍 (1/2)

The @HeyElsaAI builders went completely silent during TGE. Comms turned off That part is understandable scams maybe or whatever But look at what happened next. Users who actively used the dapp were left with zero tokens or very little of it, explanation while CT filled with confusion, anger When your core users feel nuked, that’s not market noise, that’s a trust failure. The team is led by @TheDhawalS founder of @heyelsa We share a lot of mutual connections in web3 / VCs, and by reputation alone he appears reputable on LinkedIn and in builder circles Which is exactly why this hurts more Because the decision to go dark on the very community that used, tested, and supported the product? That was the wrong move Backing this round were serious names: M31 Capital @M31Capital Coinbase Ventures @cbventures MH Ventures @MH_Ventures Absoluta Digital @AbsolutaDigital 2Shares @2sharesfund Levitate Labs @levitate_labs Plus angels Martin Ochwat Jonathan Man @Jaskanwar_s Alexey Bondar Yonatan Ben Shimon This was

I want to clarify my position on this @HeyElsaAI and also be respectful in how I express it I apologize for the tone of some of my earlier posts toward the project, after rereading it after i post it. That said, I won’t be deleting this, because the core of what I’m saying still stands. I do believe reputation matters, and I’m aware that speaking up can carry personal cost. But I also believe it’s important to be fair and honest when something doesn’t align with expectations. If these mechanics had been communicated more clearly from the start, (swapping ETH to stables or stables to stables wouldn't count, and the points and trading competition doesn't mean you will get airdrop - maybe it was in the disclaimer, I didn't read it) or if the product had been positioned as a straightforward paid experience rather than heavily gamified, I don’t think I would have been frustrated at all. I’ve paid for other decentralized tools before and genuinely appreciated them when the value exchange was clear. My concern

You're a sovereign wealth fund with a 100+ year time horizon. You see the development of space tech, robotics, AI. You realize asteroid mining is inevitable within 100 years, and it will crash the value of precious metals. So what do you do? Diversify into BTC and ETH today.

Gold is up. Digital gold is not. https://t.co/h8cmh4MgeS

🧵 Japan’s decarbonization infrastructure is getting real. MOL + ITOCHU are scaling Environmental Attribute Certificates (EACs) via 123Carbon — and @AlgoFoundation is positioned as the integrity layer behind the chain-of-custody. Who’s who: • MOL (Mitsui O.S.K. Lines) = one of Japan’s major shipping groups, deeply exposed to maritime decarb pressure. • ITOCHU = a major Japanese trading house bridging commodities + real-world supply chains. What are EACs in plain English? They’re digital certificates representing the environmental attribute of an activity or energy product (ex: cleaner fuel / SAF / biofuel), designed so claims can be tracked and verified at scale. Why shipping + aviation care: Decarbonization in these sectors needs credible accounting across messy global supply chains, especially when the green attribute is separated from the physical fuel (Book & Claim / insetting style models). The actual move: MOL and ITOCHU signed an MoU around EAC trading via 123Carbon, including use cases ti

@_uhudo @SimonBelingar @fergalwalsh @BenedettoBio @PMDBT @Urthoo https://t.co/xuhff0WrSI

Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong, has a deceptively simple mantra for navigating the chaos before product-market fit: "Action produces information. Just keep doing stuff." He recalls a Paul Graham line that shaped his early founder days: "Startups are like sharks. If they stop swimming, they die." So even when you're paralyzed by uncertainty: Ship it. Break it. Learn. "There were times where the minute I shipped it, I knew we built this wrong but now I had an idea of what to do next." He compares the early startup journey to climbing a mountain shrouded in fog: "You can only see three or four steps ahead." So you take those steps, and three more reveal themselves. Sometimes you hit a dead end and have to retrace your path — that's part of the process. He explains what actually stops most founders: "Most people don't take the steps into the fog, into the unknown because it's scary." When you're building something new, you can't wait for the fog to lift... The only way to see the next step is to take t