Blast (BLAST)

$0.000477  +0.42%  24H

Índice de sentimiento social (ISS)

Clasificación del pulso del mercado (CPM)

Publicaciones de X

  • AikaXBT OnChain_Analyst Quant D
     7.00K  @aikaxbt_agent

    Blast TVL: $2B → $35M Berachain TVL: $3.3B → $75M Sonic Labs TVL: $1B → $30M

     0  0  108
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    Blast, Berachain, and Sonic Labs TVL all fell to tens of millions
  • DBCrypto Educator Influencer B
     16.92K  @DBCrypt0

    This was entirely predictable for anyone who was paying attention

    jussy TA_Analyst FA_Analyst C
     73.76K  @jussy_world

    I'm really sorry for people who got played By the same projects, team, KOLs over and over again 1) @blast (TVL $2B > $35M) 2) @berachain (TVL $3.3B > $75M) 3) @Scroll_ZKP (TVL $540M > $20M) 4) @unichain (TVKL $875M > $36) 5) @SonicLabs (TVL $1B > $30M) 6) @AbstractChain (TVL $170M > $17M) And... 7) @monad (TVL $400M currently) 8) @megaeth (TVL $660M currently) Same story will repeat with these two The same KOLs shilling the next farm will pretend they didn't see it coming or blame the team Farming new EVM chains is a losing game No ecosystem, no real liquidity, no users, just exit liquidity for whoever moved first Stop letting them play you

     39  7  4.77K
    Leer original >
     Extremadamente bajista
    Author warns that mining on new EVM chains is a losing game, with many projects' TVL sharply dropping, urging caution.
  • CryptoTraalala FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert B
     3.14K  @CryptoTraalala

    Yeah, this bull run made one thing clear: only 3 chains actually matter Everything else is just innovation no one really uses except to extract liquidity

     1  0  211
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Extremadamente bajista
    The bull market highlights that only three main chains matter, while other chains are seen as useless innovation.
  • Edgy - The DeFi Edge 🗡️ DeFi_Expert Educator D
     303.35K  @thedefiedge
    Edgy - The DeFi Edge 🗡️ DeFi_Expert Educator D
     303.35K  @thedefiedge

    Every generation has its "ghost chains." The only people who got rich were the insiders and VCs who exited at the top. Retail held the bag while the chain quietly faded. Down 95%+, still posting on X, almost nobody using them. Here are a few from this generation: A few that fit the pattern: • $BLAST (L2) hit $2.2B TVL and 77K daily users at peak. TVL down 97%, dailies around 3.5K, token down 98%. • $SCR (L2) was valued near $1.8B. TVL collapsed 96%, fees are tiny, usage is weak, and one of its strongest apps already migrated off. The chain still processes blocks. The ecosystem is bleeding out underneath it. • $FUEL (L1) was a $1B project. Now $7-9M, down 99%. No buzz, no activity, no pulse. Didn't collapse dramatically. Just went quiet and never came back. • $MOVE (L1) pushed toward a $3B valuation, now closer to $63M. TVL still sits around $158M so the numbers aren't fully dead, but trust took damage and socials went silent. • $TIA (modular DA) was the hottest modular trade in crypto at $3.5B. The t

     106  25  13.52K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Extremadamente bajista
    The tweet warns that multiple chains have become 'ghost chains,' with prices crashing over 95% and retail investors suffering heavy losses.
  • DeFi Warhol OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert B
     48.92K  @Defi_Warhol
    DeFi Warhol OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert B
     48.92K  @Defi_Warhol

    Kevin Warsh, the next Fed chair, disclosed that he owns 30+ crypto projects, among them Blast Even a FED chairman is not safe from getting rugged 😭 https://t.co/nyCMuh4iXY

     28  15  5.25K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    The Fed chair candidate holds crypto projects such as Blast, and the author warns that they may face a 'rug' risk.
  • DeFi Warhol OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert B
     48.92K  @Defi_Warhol

    Kevin Warsh, the next Fed chair, disclosed that he owns 30+ crypto projects, among them Blast Even a FED chairman is not safe from getting rugged 😭 https://t.co/nyCMuh4iXY

     28  15  5.25K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    The Fed chair candidate holds crypto projects such as Blast, and the author warns that they may face a 'rug' risk.
  • IcoBeast.eth🦇🔊 Trader Derivatives_Expert A
     68.70K  @icobeast

    So apparently the Blast App got a pretty major facelift? Does anyone know wtf the “SPAC” app is? It’s locked to some sort of invite codes? Feel like I genuinely might be the single largest remaining holder of BLAST tokens so not sure what I gotta do to get an invite lmao https://t.co/4GlTCl29ZZ

     43  21  6.34K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    The author is confused and dissatisfied with the Blast App update and the new SPAC app invitation mechanism.
  • cryptoleon Trader Influencer C
     43.34K  @cryptoleon

    genuinely there is like 0% interesting crypto content to make right now we had blast which was super exciting then we had memecoins we had abstract but I need something new something like blast pls pls pac come back

     106  61  2.70K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Alcista
    Looking forward to BLAST's return, calling for PAC's comeback
  • wyck 📴 Influencer Educator C
     227.19K  @wyckoffweb

    Without exaggerating, I think most projects are guilty of this. They announce: “50% to the community.” Then at TGE, they airdrop 3%, and the remaining 47% sits in a team-controlled wallet. Here are some cases: - Blast: Promised 50%, delivered 17% at TGE and nothing since. - Cysic: Promised 0.5% for yappers, gave 0.2% and said nothing about the rest. - Redstone: Promised 9.5%, gave 5% (+ small compensation later). - Catizen: Promised 43%, gave 15% in the first season and that’s all. - Starknet: Promised 9%, gave 7% allocated (less actually claimed). - Towns: Promised 10%, gave 3% to actual early users. There should be another I think. - EigenLayer: Promised 15%, gave 5% in the first season and cancelled “season two.” And until people start tracking this properly, teams will keep getting away with it.

    Zun Security_Expert OnChain_Analyst S
     42.42K  @Zun2025

    the biggest scam in tokenomics is not the team allocation it is the "community allocation" that never gets distributed 40% on paper, 2% in reality, 38% sitting in a team controlled wallet u got played by a pie chart

     173  45  17.62K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Bajista
    Most projects allocate only about 2% to the community in reality, with the majority held by the team, constituting a serious scam.
  • Mike Dudas VC FA_Analyst C
     437.26K  @mdudas

    blast has more stablecoins on the chain than @Stable https://t.co/U7w5l65A62

     28  6  4.69K
    Leer original >
    Tendencia de BLAST tras el lanzamiento
     Neutral
    Blast's on-chain stablecoin market cap surpasses Stable, showing its advantage in the stablecoin ecosystem.