Bittensor (TAO)

I have a lot to give the $TAO community Before Bittensor, I had almost given up on Crypto Now I’m once again excited about the space, looking more into AI & locked in as ever I might not have made much off TAO (so far) but it’s been a major motivator for me to care about Crypto

THE CASE OF DE-AI, OR ITS UNMASKING? The US switched off Anthropic's most powerful public model overnight. AI tokens like TAO, VVV and NEAR ripped. Crypto says that's the entire case for decentralized AI. We sat down with @NEARProtocol's Illia Polosukhin @ilblackdragon, CoinFund's @jbrukh, Dragonfly's @hosseeb and Sentora's Jesus Rodriguez @jrdothoughts on whether it can actually deliver. Feature here👇 https://t.co/Db12PGhm60

Some of you have been impatient with $TAO subnet 105 @b1m_ai , I think that’s a mistake. Don’t forget this subnet is only few months old, those who are patient will be rewarded

Bittensor >> $TAO >> $dTAO rip SN 14: Cacheon It seems it's better to stay away from the subnets Latent gets involved with.

$TAO #SN14 - @cacheon_ai is soon to move to another slot following a separation with @latentholdings!

$TAO Still needs that neckline break. For now pretty insignificant price action. https://t.co/ENK8RWcgsU

Bittensor >> $dTAO That's indeed how it happened. From now on, we need to pay close attention to revenue generation and products that are actually being used. Those two factors should carry far more weight than simple media exposure or hype. We are still incredibly early when it comes to the truly good projects.

Root Reborn is one of those proposals where the intention may be good, but the implementation matters a lot. Validator-directed SN exposure introduces real complexity around incentives, custody & trust. Worth reading Yuma’s full breakdown👇 Healthy debate is needed here. $TAO

Bittensor >> Root Reborn @YumaGroup is a major player in the network, and I genuinely appreciate the way they communicate. They don't hesitate to criticize proposed updates, but they do so in a way that fosters constructive debate rather than division. They raise concerns, explain their reasoning, and contribute to the discussion without turning it into a spectacle. This is exactly the kind of actor the network cannot afford to ignore. I hope Const takes their private discussions and feedback into account. A network can only improve if it is willing to listen to criticism, especially when it comes from people who are deeply involved and genuinely care about its future. Progress does not come from everyone agreeing. It comes from our ability to challenge ideas, confront different perspectives, and refine them together.

One of the leading groups on bittensor:native, Yuma is against the current Validator changes for Bittensor "In its current form, the Root Reborn proposal carries substantial unmitigated risk that outweighs its benefits."