PAX Gold (PAXG)

Gold shops have closed, both online and offline I urge Thai people to buy gold via the #BinanceTH app, by purchasing the $PAXG token which is backed 100% by gold 🎉 No tax incurred, because trading crypto/digital tokens is tax‑exempt until the year 2572 I’m set, starting to save gold, receiving war news on the first day🥹 Brief tutorial on using the app in the comments👇 https://t.co/TN1gFq7KOf

Gold with a market cap of $33 trillion runs just like $BTC, huh AE :) https://t.co/x1R18DAe0q

After the 8‑point rate is taken, I'm preparing to reduce some positions. The reason is simply that XAU fell, which will cause the rate to drop as well; the rate reaction is relatively delayed, and the rate decline indirectly reduces the premium. By the way, the evening's maximum premium reached $220, which is already near the upper limit. Expanding further would create an arbitrage opportunity to short PAXG and long XAU. I calculated that the remaining time will still be subject to nine more rate adjustments; assuming an extreme -0.5% each, nine times amounts to about $240. Moreover, each adjustment may not hit the maximum rate, and over time we can similarly compute this upper bound, so getting close indicates an opportunity.

Wow, it's going up again.. I still hold the PAXG I bought at $2000, and I'll sell it when foreign analysts start selling gold. So far they are still holding and haven't sold gold, especially during a war like this. https://t.co/RWP8Qps5qX

PAX Gold price near $5,400 after Israel launches attack on Iran.

I've been doing weekend gold rate arbitrage for several weeks now; newly launched items always have some opportunities. As for XAU and XAG, simply put, when they rise over the weekend it's a positive rate, when they fall it's a negative rate, because the index price remains unchanged. In the afternoon I saw news of a war and immediately thought gold would rally. To be safe, I went long PAXG and short XAU as a hedge. The spread was $30 at the time, now it has widened to $100, and PAXG is at a negative rate while XAU is at a positive rate—earning both ways. Of course, I will close the position early before the Monday open, because once trading starts the premium disappears, and so does the rate.

🟡 Gold is already almost at $5,300 I don't know how many times I've repeated this to you this month, if you're not making money it's simply because you don't want to 🥲 https://t.co/TvaRPkiSSi

$PAXG is the $GOLD related ticker you can long or short on most major crypto venues. Eventually you should be able to hedge your portfolio with a 2-3x short you just sit on. Just like you were able to on the long side. https://t.co/nqNfJy801h

Take a look at Animoca Brands Research's "2025 Token Listing Report" and you’ll find some counter‑intuitive data ▪️In 2025, 9 major CEXs together listed tokens 3,007 times (not low, and many are cs‑tokens) ▪️But the “independent new‑coin count” fell 21% YoY (1,645 → 1,302) because exchanges tightened their vetting ▪️Small‑FDV (< $30 million) projects have noticeably shrunk (the old days of a PPT slide and a tiny market‑cap getting listed are fading) 📊 The overall crypto market is indeed contracting, with liquidity concentrating Exchanges are becoming pickier about listings Here’s an interesting figure for Gate in 2025: ▪️Total listed tokens: 549 ▪️Of those, 393 were primary listings That ratio is unusually high in the industry – why does it matter? A clear 2025 pattern: 📅 Day 1 is the main liquidity window for a token, and new‑coins lose on average more than 30% within the first 30 days 📉 Mid‑year, a batch‑shorting strategy emerged – simultaneously list 20 new tokens, set stop‑losses, and except for 1‑2 scam tokens, about 80% turned profitable. This mirrors the ecosystem: most projects aim for a quick pump‑and‑dump. So if you’re a trader – “Where is the primary listing?” may be more critical than “Where does it get added later?” FDV structure is shifting; the mid‑cap segment is now the main battlefield ▪️Industry‑average listing FDV rose from $697 million to $873 million (+25%) ▪️Gate’s average listing FDV jumped +134% YoY (the highest in the industry) This reflects a structural change: ▪️Top exchanges (Binance, OKX) now focus on tokens > $500 million ▪️MEXC concentrates on tokens < $30 million ▪️Gate covers tokens between $30 million and $500 million The density of “growth‑range” tokens is higher, meaning on Gate you’re more likely to trade assets with high volatility but relatively stable fundamentals. What I thought was hype – RWA – actually has real volume: Q4: ▪️Gate tokenized stocks: 80 listings, $3.9 billion volume; new crypto listings that quarter hit $12 billion ▪️Tokenized Gold Q4 total turnover: $7.6 billion ▪️Binance leads on PAXG, Gate leads on XAUt Exchanges are getting less “pure” – besides tokens they now list US stocks and precious metals. Summary: @Gate in 2025 leans toward structural补位: ▪️High primary‑listing density ▪️Deep mid‑cap coverage ▪️RWA with genuine transaction flow ▪️Crypto still retains core liquidity "Everything Exchange" Not just spot, horizontal expansion may be the breakthrough. Data extracted from Animoca Brands Research "2025 Token Listing Report" #Crypto #Gate #RWA #Listing

Tokenized commodities just did something most people missed. While February was noisy across crypto, commodity RWAs expanded quietly, pushing total on-chain AUM to $7.33B, up +16.3% in 30 days. No hype cycle. No reflexive token bid. That divergence is the signal. Underlying commodity exposure is scaling. Governance-layer reflexivity is not. ● Capital Is Rotating Into Hard On-Chain Assets Over the first three weeks of February 2026, approximately $1.1B in net new capital entered tokenized commodity products. The drivers are structural: 1. Macro hedging: Inflation sensitivity and rate uncertainty pushed on-chain desks toward gold and silver exposure. 2. Energy tokenization: Crude oil and carbon-linked instruments moved from pilot usage into liquid secondary markets, contributing roughly 14% of monthly growth. This is inventory allocation, not yield farming. ● AUM Is Growing Without Token Reflexivity Despite a +16.3% increase in managed commodity value, native protocol tokens posted an average –0.6% p