Aave (AAVE)

$196.71  +1.23%  24H

ソーシャル・センチメント・インデックス（SSI）

マーケット・パルス・ランキング（MPR）

Xへの投稿

  • 吴说区块链 Media Researcher D
     168.37K  @wublockchain12

    Wu said that according to DeFiLlama data, DeFi TVL has fallen from its peak by nearly $50 billion to $122.04 billion. Notably, only four protocols still have TVL above $10 billion, and aside from Aave, the other three are LRT/Restaking. https://t.co/AuWbMBCQg0

     0  0  51
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     弱気
    DeFi TVL drops to $122.04 billion, only four protocols remain above $10 billion
  • Stani.eth Founder DeFi_Expert C
     278.56K  @StaniKulechov

    DeFi for everyone. https://t.co/mvA8pZK28Y

    brileigh D
     1.33K  @0xbrileigh

    I really hope the @aave mobile app wins big, we need something unrelated to the casino to point to when 2028 rolls around it’s consistently the only app I can really get friends outside of tech to see value in

     9  3  434
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     強気
    AAVE mobile outlook looks promising, expected to become mainstream DeFi by 2028
  • Stani.eth Founder DeFi_Expert C
     278.56K  @StaniKulechov
    Maple D
     58.13K  @maplefinance

    Maple assets on @aave: $600M+ in total deposits across @ethereum and @Plasma in less than two months. This is what real, scalable and capital-efficient DeFi is. Just use syrupUSDT on Aave. https://t.co/dTinjnQE5s

     134  30  10.54K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     強気
    Maple Finance has deposited over $600M on Aave, showcasing the strong potential of DeFi.
  • Stani.eth Founder DeFi_Expert C
     278.56K  @StaniKulechov

    Resiliency. https://t.co/Bj2cYN0qtr

    Vicki.hl D
     5.29K  @vickydiamond21

    After the market correction, @aave is the only DeFi protocol (excluding LST/LRT platforms) still holding over $10B in TVL. Years of liquidity building and a strong track record have become a moat that competitors can’t easily replicate. https://t.co/1BVoiJXIJE

     2  1  191
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     強気
    Aave continues to maintain over $10 billion TVL after the market correction, demonstrating strong resilience and a leading position.
  • Indeed 👻 ⚛️ ☀️🚀 FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst B
     1.05K  @Yougetwhatyoup2

    There is a fight at $AAVE 🥲 AAVE Labs recently integrated CoW Swap as a swap tool on its AAVE website interface. This generates fees estimated at about $200,000 per week. These fees are now directed to AAVE Labs instead of the DAO... Hoping it calms down quickly.

     1  0  24
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     弱気
    AAVE fee shift to the lab, weakening the DAO, short-term outlook pressured
  • Eldar DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst A
     2.00K  @eldarcap

    Nice write up on the inner working of @aave V4. It offers way more modularity. One thing though is that for lender, like $USDT supplier to a hub, you still get exposed to the risk of each linked Spoke. And if multiple Hub are created to gather for different risk profile (Spoke link profile) then liquidity is still a bit fragmented. But the new model allow to manage those risk with more granularity and to get more from them.

    stablewatch D
     8.00K  @stablewatchHQ

    https://t.co/C9bNXAF0dO

     0  0  134
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     強気
    Aave V4提升模块化，可更细致管理风险，潜在收益更高。
  • 0xLouisT FA_Analyst Tokenomics_Expert S
     9.84K  @0xLouisT

    Whether through trying to launch a 2nd token or redirecting value to its own equity, Aave Labs has been deeply parasitic to the Aave DAO. The biggest threat to any token and DAO is a competing, independent equity vehicle. AAVE tokenholders should push back much more aggressively against this long-term risk and support the work being done by @Marczeller.

    Ignas | DeFi DeFi_Expert Influencer C
     157.29K  @DefiIgnas

    https://t.co/6IVI5nykf2

     118  18  11.91K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     弱気
    AAVE faces governance risk; token holders need to actively resist.
  • Stani.eth Founder DeFi_Expert C
     278.56K  @StaniKulechov
    nader dabit Dev Educator B
     172.97K  @dabit3

    Something that deserves more weight in these discussions is how much of Aave's success over the years is due to Aave Labs/Avara, and how challenging it is to run an actual company as a DAO. DAOs are structurally incapable of shipping competitive software. Every product decision becomes a governance proposal, every pivot requires token holder consensus, and every fast-moving opportunity dies in a forum thread while competitors execute. The reality is that if Aave had been governed purely as a DAO from day one it would have been outpaced years ago by teams that can make decisions in hours rather than weeks or months. Stani + Aave Labs built the brand, the UX, the integrations, and the security infrastructure that tokenholders now claim economic ownership over, and they did it precisely because they operated with startup-level autonomy, not DAO-level bureaucracy. World-class software isn't built by committees of contractors and rotating service providers, it's built by tight-knit, in-house teams with deep

     77  13  5.77K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     強気
    Aave succeeded because of its centralized team, while DAOs struggle to iterate quickly.
  • 𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖗 Media DeFi_Expert D
     51.78K  @safetyth1rd

    Great insight into the aave labs aave dao dispute recently regarding front end fees Recommend reading it but tldr is aave labs not looking out for aave here

    Ignas | DeFi DeFi_Expert Influencer C
     157.29K  @DefiIgnas

    https://t.co/6IVI5nykf2

     15  2  2.04K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     弱気
    Aave Labs is unfavorable to Aave, the front‑end fee dispute suggests a bearish outlook.
  • nader dabit Dev Educator B
     172.97K  @dabit3
    nader dabit Dev Educator B
     172.97K  @dabit3

    Something that deserves more weight in these discussions is how much of Aave's success over the years is due to Aave Labs/Avara, and how challenging it is to run an actual company as a DAO. DAOs are structurally incapable of shipping competitive software. Every product decision becomes a governance proposal, every pivot requires token holder consensus, and every fast-moving opportunity dies in a forum thread while competitors execute. The reality is that if Aave had been governed purely as a DAO from day one it would have been outpaced years ago by teams that can make decisions in hours rather than weeks or months. Stani + Aave Labs built the brand, the UX, the integrations, and the security infrastructure that tokenholders now claim economic ownership over, and they did it precisely because they operated with startup-level autonomy, not DAO-level bureaucracy. World-class software isn't built by committees of contractors and rotating service providers, it's built by tight-knit, in-house teams with deep

     77  13  5.77K
    オリジナル >
    リリース後のAAVEのトレンド
     弱気
    DAO governance slows Aave, requires startup team drive