THORChain (RUNE)

Told you $RUNE was not looking bad, and here we are. Another retest of support, and price started to pump from there. Really love to see it. 💰 https://t.co/ehpMGRPXJH https://t.co/iEjw6zGOPY

$RUNE is not looking bad here, especially if it manages to hold above that support level recently reclaimed. If we find acceptance back in the range, resistance should be next! https://t.co/N927TR2Om8

$Rune (4h) trying to break HVN/POC... https://t.co/iYnfxOpZnu

$Rune (4h) reached 40 cents, definitely some selling happening in those two 4h wicks https://t.co/5084U13p9E

$RUNE (4h) with another 10~15% pump today, reaching VAL/POC zone. Around the POC we can see clearly defined HVN region, so 40 cents is the most important level locally https://t.co/ftvEsP9pE1

Not every token should do everything 🎯 Clear roles create stronger ecosystems 🚀

what happened to rune june? 🥲 take me back https://t.co/zdOGzTqwBh

I have seen many such stories recently: on terrible security practices and ethos from the THORChain project, which is a shame, really, as the project's original vision is (was?) fantastic + unpaid bounties when their BBP was both open and closed + fixing reported vulnerabilities without paying or crediting the security researchers who found them Which leads me to agree with @kayabaNerve, here ↓ > "Their track record of treating security professionals horribly, with multiple other such incidents, has done nothing but continue to the point they simply deserve to get hacked" We are entering a new paradigm security-wise Those who do not adapt and start applying good security practices and properly rewarding independent security researchers will become big black hat targets and die pretty quickly thorchain:native may become one of the first real proofs of that

Be Thorchain > Hacked 4x > White hat reports an exploit > Silently patch it > Refuse bounty, claim program closed Stop using protocols that gamble with your money