Uniswap (UNI)

#UNI I shared a spot purchase at $2.50, analysis is ongoing, we are holding at an 80% profit; if the DeFi movement continues, both assets will reach my next targets. I had shared these purchases at USDT.D 9.20%. Those who say they have no money are the ones who don’t know how to buy at the right place. https://t.co/RArXm0FiS7

What if Uniswap bought Dexscreener, cleaned up the UI and made Uniswap the default swap layer? Own discovery, own intent, own execution. I don’t know, sounds like a cool fit lol

hook szn now. ppl ignored Uniswap V4 for a year and now the whole tl is suddenly bullish. it lets devs plug custom logic into a pool (bonding curves, dynamic fees, NFT mints on swaps) while still inheriting Uniswap's routing and liquidity. memes, NFTs, RWA/compliance pools all getting built. @zero1cash - $01: ownerless money primitive with bonding curves, a yield-backed reserve, lending, and shielded transfers all enforced at the pool level @0xprogrammable - $V4: launchpad for programmable tokens with open-source hook models that enforce custom market behavior directly at the pool level @unipegv4 - $uPEG: turns every whole token into a fully on-chain 24×24 unicorn SVG, with a hook that updates the on-chain seed on every swap so the artwork evolves alongside trading @lo0pio - $LO0P: unlocks idle LP liquidity for ETH borrowing at ~40% LTV, making the same pool handle both trading and lending @EIC_Finance - $EIC: hooks route every $EIC trade fee into a vault that auto-buys a fixed basket of tokenized compute equities ($NVDA, $AMD, $MU, $INTC, $CRWV) @token_works - $FWA: NFT/asset gacha where depositors pair NFTs with ETH collateral to set pull odds and a standing buybacck price, with spins randomized via Chainlink VRF @isBacked_ - $BACKED: routes every trade fee into a permanently locked vault of tokenized blue-chip stocks, with holders able to redeem their pro-rata share onchain at any time @flaunchgg - $FLAY: launchpad with fixed-price launches, creator ETH fees, automatic buybacks, tokenized fee NFTs, and an upcoming skill-based Game Mode all run directly inside custom hooks still early for the hook rabbit hole.

Uniswap finally started making real profit. After the V4 fee switch went live, daily protocol revenue rose from $118,000 to $318,000, and UNI burns accelerated in tandem, with Robinhood Chain contributing over half of the revenue. However, current traffic heavily relies on meme trades and gas-free subsidies. Once the subsidies expire in September, whether revenue can be maintained will become the first real test of this business model.

📌@RobinhoodApp vs @arc | liquidity first or infrastructure first? I see these ecosystems as two different answers to the same problem: How do you bring real financial activity onchain and make it stay? [1] Robinhood Chain starts with user attention Its early activity is being driven by trading, memes and launchpads rather than tokenized stocks. Key infrastructure is already forming around: – @Uniswap for liquidity – @Morpho for lending – @Lighter_xyz for perps and stock-token trading – @TheIndexFi for RWA exposure – Arcus, Rialto and Arrakis for trading and liquidity management Personally, I think Robinhood’s strongest asset is not its technology. It is distribution. Robinhood can place crypto, stocks, prediction markets and DeFi in front of the same retail users. The challenge is whether that attention can become long-term capital instead of temporary speculative volume. [2] Arc starts with financial rails @arc is building around stablecoins, payments, FX and institutional settlement. Its ecosystem already includes: – @PulsarMoneyApp for consumer stablecoin payments – @TowerExchange for stablecoin liquidity routing – @UnitFlowFinance for trading and yield – @BlockradarHQ for wallet and compliance infrastructure – @ViFi_Labs for cross-border stablecoin FX – @synthra_finance for spot, liquidity and perps – @usesfxmoneyapp and @payritHQ for payment rails My view is that Arc may attract more serious capital early, but infrastructure alone does not guarantee an active market. It still needs traders, borrowers and applications that create recurring demand. So the real comparison is: – Robinhood has users and needs to deepen their financial activity – Arc has financial infrastructure and needs to create open market activity I would not judge either chain by early TVL or volume. The better signal is whether assets become useful across trading, lending, collateral and payments. That is when liquidity stops being temporary and starts compounding.

Whale 0xFF5 is making a series of notable moves: - 16h ago, it deposited more than 550k USDT into a Binance deposit wallet. - 41min ago, it bought more than 10k $AAVE worth approximately $1M, then immediately supplied it to Aave and borrowed 400k USDT. - 37 minutes ago, it purchased 128.264kK $UNI worth $545.91k from Binance. This whale may be building a LONG position in UNI on Binance, with nearly $1M in USDT sent to its Binance deposit wallet potentially serving as a reserve to cover any margin requirements if the position comes under pressure! https://t.co/4bCBPvBRnj

For example, with one million US dollars Dollar-cost average $UNI over 6 months You will thank me later

So suddenly everyone realizes Uniswap is core DeFi infra and $UNI should be worth something? best example of the absolute retardedness of CT during these last 4-5 years. play longterm games.

UNI is the next HYPE On July 29, it burned 106,000 tokens in a single day, the third highest in history. Annualized burn is $170 million, deflation rate 6.1%. The key is token distribution: UNI is fully circulating, while HYPE still has 70% locked. With the same burn logic, a cleaner supply, UNI will only be stronger than HYPE. $UNI $HYPE