Staking was long blocked by SEC rules, but the dam just broke: Grayscale now stakes >70% of its $4.7B ETH ETF holdings, and BlackRock filed for its own staked ETH ETF.
With $18B in assets, ETH ETFs already control almost as much staked ETH as Lido — and that’s before the real inflows hit.
Here’s who wins (and loses) in the coming staking wars.👇
~~ Analysis by @JackInabinet ~~
Winner-Take-All Markets
Two core dynamics in crypto staking naturally push the system toward winner-take-all outcomes, where a single provider can end up dominating the market.
Liquidity Advantages:
The largest staking provider for a given crypto asset can offer its stakers superior liquidity, a top concern for many price-sensitive institutional holders, including ETF managers who must process redemptions.
For example, staking with Lido, which controls 24% of all ETH staked, yields stETH, a fungible deposit receipt that can be swapped instantly at market prices or redeemed over a period of days at a 1:1 ratio for ETH. Whether swapping or redeeming, stETH holders typically receive stronger execution than alternatives thanks to its deeper liquidity and larger validator base.
Economies of Scale:
Currently, Lido takes a 10% commission on customers' ETH staking rewards, a lower fee than any other blue-chip staking provider.
Although Lido has never reduced commissions as part of a low-cost strategy, a top staking provider could readily pull in more stakers by cutting fees, underpricing rivals while boosting profits as users chase superior rewards.
Clear examples of this dynamic exist in TradFi, where Vanguard cemented its pioneering reputation in the 1980s by introducing low-cost passive indexing. Those products offered better returns than the high-fee active strategies that prevailed then. Today the asset-management landscape is ruled by low-cost passive indexers, with an unmistakable link between lower fees and larger assets under management.
Who Wins?
While Lido is the current standout Ethereum staking provider, as an increasing number of staked ETH ETFs come to market, it is possible the current order is upended.
Coinbase is still well behind the leading ETH staking providers, controlling just one quarter of Lido's share at 6.3% of total ETH staked, but it remains the clear heavyweight in institutional crypto custody. As of June, Coinbase custodied 81% of all U.S. ETF crypto asset holdings.
Although it might be logical to assume that Lido will simply expand its staking dominance with ETF managers incentivized to use Lido for its liquidity advantages and economies of scale, Coinbase is arguably better positioned to capture these flows.
In traditional finance, relationships matter. ETF managers need a custodial staking partner with a name and face they can trust to withstand regulatory scrutiny, provide audited assurances, and (in a worst case scenario) be summoned to court.
Coinbase spent years cultivating relationships across Wall Street, and successfully embedded itself as the default crypto custodian for institutions in the process. So when those same institutions look for a staking partner, Coinbase may be the natural first call.
Concentration Dangers
If BlackRock, which manages the largest ETH ETF, were to stake its ETH through Coinbase, a firm in which BlackRock's products hold 7% ownership, the exchange could quickly overtake Lido as the dominant ETH staking provider.
When Coinbase staking products receive inflows from ETFs, the amount of liquidity available for redemptions naturally increases. Additionally, Coinbase can solidify its control over staking markets by dropping staking commissions, providing a financial incentive for even more stakers to make the switch.
In Ethereum and many other Proof of Stake blockchains, there are three critical staking dominance thresholds. As a staking group crosses each one, it gains greater influence over the chain and access to higher staking rewards. In turn, these higher yields help to reinforce the leader's position, discouraging delegation elsewhere and accelerating centralization.
These systemic centralization risks will exist regardless of which operator becomes dominant, but if Coinbase surpassed these thresholds, the outcome would be especially stark, effectively handing total authority over a blockchain designed for decentralization to a centralized corporation accountable only to its shareholders.
Ethereum (ETH)
chainyoda FA_Analyst Researcher B41.86K @chainyoda
Ryan Watkins D85.97K @RyanWatkins_35 10 4.08K Оригінал >Тенденція ETH після випускуНейтральні
adrian defi OnChain_Analyst DeFi_Expert B2.03K @0xadriandefi
blocmates. D85.38K @blocmates0 0 23 Оригінал >Тенденція ETH після випускуБичачий
