144.1K @Airdrops_one Respect to @sunnya97 for being direct post-vote. A lot of founders would’ve dragged this out.
The @osmosis aftermath is a good reminder: tokens are not equity.
They’re a bet that the team keeps building, with zero contractual obligation that they do.
This isn’t an Osmosis problem. It’s a token market problem.
Nothing personal, just incentives.
🫡
41
12
4.9K
8.9K @tokenpostkr Osmosis, Cosmos Hub integration proposal rejected…maintains independent operation
https://t.co/VB6Hg2Z4aV https://t.co/Jt8ATWTo4W
0
0
18
13.1K @_TomHoward Osmosis is HORMUZ of Cosmos.
All onchain liquidity in Cosmos ecosystem? On Osmosis!
If $OSMO stops running, the ENTIRE Cosmos ecosystem seizes up, including $ATOM!
This is a liquidity CHOKEPOINT, just like the Straight of Hormuz is for Gulf oil.
What if Osmosis goes down?
As the market contracts, it has already suffered down time recently, freezing Cosmos tokens of out liquidity.
The $171m treasury of @interchain_io can support @osmosis operations indefinitely and restart Cosmos liquidity indefinitely! (including $ATOM)
Absolutely suicidal that 50m ATOM holders are voting NO! https://t.co/UIZqk79KLj
Cosmos never ceases to self own.
16
8
1.3K
