Monad (MON)

$0.02880  -4.00%  24H

社交熱度指數(SSI)

市場預警排名(MPR)

相關推文

  • K G (MON to $1) D
     9.34K  @KGdotmon

    The Spiky mint is going in a way that I could only dream of 🟪 > 573 OG Spikes out of 600 minted > 861 out of 1200 SpikeListed minted with 2 more hours to go 80% mint rate has always been my personal target for all the times we've been building Spiky and right now, we are sitting exactly at 80%! 💜 SpeakyList round starts soon Spike it UP ONLY

     107  27  2.21K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     極度看漲
    Spiky NFT minting progress is impressive, having reached the 80% target, and the author is extremely satisfied and bullish about it.
  • Potato13 DeFi_Expert Researcher S
     3.60K  @0xPotato_13

    GSpiky One like and I am buying this MFER! Remember FCFS starts at 12:00 UTC!

     21  9  262
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     看漲
    The author plans to purchase a Spiky NFT in the FCFS event, requiring payment of 2199 MON.
  • Steinat 🌊 Tokenomics_Expert Community_Lead C
     2.84K  @CryptoLios

    Gm Everyone Happy a new day.. $MON hasn’t been able to break above 0.05 since launch. It was priced better even in pre market. Do you think it could recover soon? https://t.co/mOEomagwTd

     8  6  242
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     看跌
    MON has performed poorly since its launch, failing to break $0.05, and the author doubts its ability to recover.
  • kowei.iota Founder Community_Lead A
     3.98K  @kowei1995
    戈多Godot(🔱,🔱).manta D
     12.77K  @GodotSancho

    Recently saw a lot of discussions about @monad $MON and public chain moats. As an L2 contributor, I truly feel that the so-called “building ecosystem” has been disproved 🥲 If you build a public chain or L2 from scratch, with a completely sincere heart and want to develop the project, the first thing to consider is where the users and on-chain funds will come from. When you go around seeking cooperation, you’ll find that no one pays attention, and even paying a KOL for promotion gets rejected. At this point you realize that the most basic demand is confidence that you won’t run away, not concern for your chain’s performance or technology. You need strong VC financing to provide brand endorsement. The question is, what do VC investors look for? You need a prestigious school and big‑company background, preferably a cryptography background, or a partner with cryptography expertise. Assuming you happen to have all that and find a cryptography‑background partner, and successfully raise funds, a small group of people will try to farm on your chain following the financing news, and KOLs will approach you for collaboration opportunities. Then you face the problem of how users move money onto your chain. If it’s a public chain without a token issuance, you can only rely on testnet airdrops. If it’s an L2, you need to find cross‑chain bridges; most bridges are pool‑to‑pool, so the types of funds that can reach your chain are very limited, essentially only the two stablecoins USDT and USDC, and ETH and its LST assets. Of course the asset amount won’t be huge, because people are still somewhat worried you might run away. The critical issue is that if there is no native USDT or USDC on your chain, those two tokens are actually derivatives locked in the bridge’s USDT/USDC. If the bridge encounters problems, you have no way to redeem users’ assets. Talk to Tether and Circle for cooperation? The basic fee starts at several million dollars, so it’s better to give up. Consequently, your chain’s DeFi liquidity is limited to USDT‑USDC and ETH‑wstETH pairs, which is meaningless. Assets coming via bridges are obviously insufficient; the liquidity hub is exchanges. If exchanges enable withdrawals from your public chain, that would be a huge help. However, you’ll find that most exchanges charge a listing fee; the biggest one doesn’t charge but expects value from you. Congratulations, you’ve hit the KPI. What about TVL? You have to approach institutions, BD whales, and big holders one by one, promising returns. When you issue a token, you can supplement their TVL contribution with an APY. On‑chain activity? Mature large DeFi projects won’t care about you unless you can promise massive liquidity—i.e., deploy at least ten million or over a hundred million dollars of TVL to the project; only then will they consider deploying on your chain. Otherwise, depth is insufficient, no one uses it, and even if they deploy, it’s meaningless. GameFi, NFT? Basically dead. Projects that come to you are mainly after grant funding; you can just copy an existing project,

     305  99  82.06K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     極度看跌
    L2/public-chain ecosystem building faces huge challenges such as users, capital, and liquidity; the author believes its model has been disproved.
  • LinkTOAD goldnutter 𓆏⬡⬢🌊𓀡 Dev OnChain_Analyst B
     1.48K  @GoldNutter
    Aks_Hunt(mainnet arc) D
     2.79K  @Akichn_

    Why is everyone bearish on @monad when the numbers look like THIS? 🤯 In just 7 days: - TVL: 54M → 198M (almost 4x) - Stablecoins mcap: 123M → 453M (3.5x) - 100M+ daily DEX volume 🌉 Bridge inflows to Monad: 16M from Ethereum (25% of total ETH outflow) 5M from Solana (15%) 5M from Arbitrum (17%) 4M from Base (17%) 🧩 82 protocols live 🛠️ Dev tooling is insane (read @keoneHD latest article) Community might be mid right now, no big runner yet, but incentives aren’t even live… 👉 47% of total supply still coming to the ecosystem. Yeah, the team has a solid percentage but they spent 3 years building from scratch. I met Keone IRL: this guy cares about the product way more than the money. And nobody’s talking about the tech working flawlessly since launch. Still holding my $MON long on @PinguExchange, probably adding more. At 270M mcap, for this tech… it feels criminally undervalued.

     200  29  7.63K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     看漲
    MON market cap $27 billion, TVL undervalued by 4×, bullish recommendation
  • Atticus Founder Tokenomics_Expert A
     3.12K  @ZaizDefiant

    Peak efficiency is when volumes exceed pool TVLs by multiples! Cool to see our pools over at @AethonSwap with over 100% in utilization, reaching over 300%+ for our top pool $MON - $USDC. This means our pools are ultra-capital efficient, supporting trade volumes with a fraction of TVL. Next goal is scaling the TVL for even greater volume heights!

     9  1  372
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     看漲
    AethonSwap liquidity pools demonstrate high capital efficiency, with the MON/USDC pool's trading volume far exceeding its liquidity.
  • Gentleman Influencer Community_Lead B
     23.19K  @zextu

    longing $mon market makers and vc's will scam pump it to pre market prices so retail will fomo and start buying every dip every coin needs to be pumped to give hopium to retail and monad market makers will do the same scam pump is awaited. it could take few weeks. let's see how this plays

     11  6  318
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     看漲
    MON is expected to be short-squeeze pumped to pre-market prices within a few weeks, and retail will buy along the wave
  • DinhTien | 🎒 Researcher Tokenomics_Expert B
     8.78K  @DinhtienSol

    Gm Tried a small experiment and it actually clicked. Bought a Lad, opened @Backpack, staked to the Backpack validator, pushed Season tasks, linked the wallet into FABRIC and claimed the badge whole setup under 15 minutes. UX felt deliberate, not sloppy. Points started compounding, I hit ~1.8k in a few days. When a tiny $MON drip hit I rotated part into camera + snowboarding travel gear for a solo trip. Hardware still the tricky piece, but the stack pays in real life, not just vibes This combo @MadLads + @Backpack + FABRIC identity is a coherent play for rewards that convert to stuff you actually use. WAO. #Solana #NFTs #Web3 If you’re holding a Lad and not running the validator + link yet, what’s stopping you?

     9  5  79
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     極度看漲
    The author is extremely satisfied with the Backpack ecosystem experience, finds the rewards substantial and practical, and strongly recommends participation.
  • Architect🛡️ Dev Trader A
     8.22K  @Architect9000

    Hey 0x755b, let’s be friends. $MON https://t.co/pnvON4098I

    Lookonchain OnChain_Analyst Researcher B
     672.41K  @lookonchain

    Whale 0x755b keeps buying $MON. Since launch, he has spent 2.31M $USDC to buy 70.64M $MON at an average price of $0.03267 — now sitting on over $250K in unrealized losses. https://t.co/rEr88EKTuz https://t.co/Xk3eaH5XMO

     14  2  1.47K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     中性
    Whale 0x755b continues buying MON, has invested 2.31M USDC, currently holding a $250K unrealized loss.
  • InfoSpace OG DeFi_Expert FA_Analyst C
     93.64K  @InfoSpace_OG

    Explained this in response to a Nad's Post but they still don't get it. Every new Protocol need Core Believers to push the ecosystem especially at the early stage. These core believers need to believe they can make money off the token/chain to bullpost it. This is fundamental. Monad made a number of mistakes along the line which they're paying for; 1. Alienated a lot of their core believers with the Reward (Airdrop) system 2. Low Float, High FDV Token. 3. To make matters worse, launched ICO at a high price (compared to market sentiments). At launch, ICO buyers weren't bullish about making money again, they don't just wanna have an L. More reason why the little pump wasn't sustained. 4. To make matters worse, the core early Projects on the Chain performed woefully. Now, a question to the Nads - who would any outsider wants to buy a low float, high FDV token or trench on a chain with core projects failing?

     43  13  3.82K
    閱讀原文 >
    釋出後MON走勢
     看跌
    Monad's outlook is bearish due to a botched airdrop, low float, high FDV, and poor project performance.