INFINIT (IN)

INFINIT $IN Token goes live on Kraken, expanding access to AI-powered DeFi execution with fiat pairs, deeper liquidity, and global reach.

Read more🔽

https://t.co/sWGhIhvzk5

unintended consequences incoming if agent strategy marketplaces go fully permissionless too early. most of @Infinit_Labs’ traction came from relatively high quality, curated templates + clean receipts flood the zone with copy pasta and half-baked “yield” and perceived quality collapses, reputational harm follows

the fix is boring but right: require $IN stake per template with slashing for bad routes, decay-based leaderboards, enforce on-chain receipts and deterministic sims, cap budgets until canary runs clear, default kill-switch and rollback, and route via private orderflow to blunt mev. keep a curated front page, let permissionless live behind a filter with warnings

open gates later, after the design proves itself on good strategies. otherwise you reinvent spamdexing in #DeFi and call it #AgenticDeFi

I want my agents without the data hangover. Most dashboards siphon your history; I’m flipping it so I own it. The @OpenledgerHQ x @Infinit_Labs setup turns strategy logs into a data pod I control agents read, I decide what’s shared, assets stay in my wallet

DOs
- opt into local data pods, enable anonymized execution traces to improve routing
- pin agent permissions and review per‑protocol scopes before running
- rotate session keys weekly, scrub off‑chain identifiers
- stake $IN to prioritize budgets for heavier sims
- publish strategy stats without wallet linking

DON’Ts
- leak raw prompts with addresses embedded
- run templates missing receipts or audit trails
- leave 3rd‑party analytics on by default

I’ll live tweet the next 7 days on fills, fail rates, and accuracy, then open source a template if the privacy tradeoffs hold. If data becomes capital in #AgenticDeFi, $IN becomes the router for intent and consent. Who else is testing this privacy‑first setup in #DeFi?