Australian Digital Dollar (AUDD)

Yes, good move. Stablecoin issuers will need to be licensed in Australia under recently passed federal legislation.

🧵 AUDD gets licensed. Hedera gets validated.
Why this matters more than people think.

This week, AUDD’s issuer (AUDC) was granted an AFSL licence by Australia’s regulator.
That’s not a crypto headline.
That’s financial infrastructure.

AUDD is a regulated Australian dollar stablecoin, fully backed 1:1 by AUD and issued by a licensed Australian financial services provider.
It is designed for real‑world payments, settlements, and treasury use, not speculation.
By running on @HederaFndn, AUDD combines fiat compliance with public DLT settlement at production scale.

An AFSL allows the issuer to provide non‑cash payment facilities under Australian law.
Translation:
AUDD is now a regulated digital payment instrument, not a grey‑zone stablecoin.

Here’s the key detail many miss:
AUDD runs on Hedera.

Not as an experiment.
Not as a pilot.
As the production settlement layer.

This means a licensed fiat stablecoin is settling value on a public DLT that regulators are comfortable with.
That’s a major signal for how fut

🧵 AUDD is building both liquidity and rails: XDC/Curve + Hedera/Acacia 🇦🇺

$AUDD’s expansion isn’t a who wins story, it’s a two‑layer build:
✅ Liquidity where it trades/routes (XDC + Curve)
✅ Rails where it settles/integrates (Hedera + wholesale pilots)

Quick context: AUDD (Australian Digital Dollar) is an AUD‑denominated stablecoin. The point isn’t speculation, it’s payments + settlement.

The pain point is real: AU↔US business transfers can mean multi‑day settlement + meaningful fees. That’s exactly why firms look for digital payment alternatives.

This is where XDC x AUDD fits: modernizing payment infrastructure for Australia–US / broader APAC trade corridors with a focus on efficiency (TradeFi/RWA vibes).

And the Curve piece matters: a deep AUDD–USDC pool isn’t just DeFi. It’s practical plumbing:
• better on‑chain FX (AUD↔USD)
• lower slippage
• easier routing for real flows

In other words: liquidity is utility. You can’t use a stablecoin at scale if it’s hard/expensive to swap, hedge, or move between stable assets.

Now the other layer: Hedera. AUDD launched as a native Hedera deployment with the usual pitch institutions care about: fast finality + predictable low fees + stablecoin tooling.

This is why the “XDC vs Hedera” framing misses it:
• XDC/Curve helps AUDD move (liquidity + routing)
• Hedera helps AUDD settle (rails + predictable cost structure)

The macro signal in Australia is wholesale digital money experimentation (Project Acacia / tokenized settlement trials). That’s where rails narratives get tested beyond marketing.

Project Acacia (RBA + DFCRC) is Australia’s sandbox for wholesale digital money + tokenized settlement — aimed at banks/institutions, not retail payments.
They’re testing multiple settlement assets (stablecoins / deposit tokens / pilot wCBDC) across a multi‑DLT setup — with Hedera named as one of the platforms.

The clean thesis: AUDD wants to be the programmable AUD layer for trade/payment use cases and that requires both:
• liquid markets (Curve‑style venues)
• settlement‑grade rails (institutional lanes)

Final take: This is what progress looks — not tribal chains — multi‑chain money.
AUDD where it trades. AUDD where it settles.

👉 https://t.co/S19MugRI6a