Rainbow (RNBW)

gm noticed @rainbowdotme push now shows points earned in notif instant credit nudged me to finish a tiny task, nice habit hack for more $RNBW #Web3 https://t.co/69cd5rZQAf

gm found a dev sandbox in @rainbowdotme that simulates points for dry runs saved gas on onboarding tests, useful for builders wanting predictable $RNBW signals #Web3 https://t.co/EsVHXV7AY8

thanks for the thoughtful response, @alexlaprade…i appreciate you taking the time to engage directly and acknowledge responsibility for the tge decision.

i want to clarify that my concern isn’t about short-term price action or market timing, and i understand the importance of executing on commitments and building for the long term. the issue i was trying to surface is specifically around launch structure and early-supporter alignment.

presale participants took the earliest risk and entered at a materially higher implied valuation. the current outcome leaves many of those holders deeply underwater from day one, with limited optionality. that gap (regardless of long-term vision) is what feels difficult and is driving frustration.

i hear the points on transparency, future product expansion, and staking, and i’m glad those are in motion. what would really help restore confidence is clearer communication on how token-level mechanics will support early holders over time…whether through staking design, liquidity strategy, unlock considerations, or other mechanisms that directly address the imbalance at launch.

i’m still supportive of rainbow and aligned with the long-term ambition. i just believe acknowledging this specific issue (and outlining how it will be handled) would go a long way for the presale community that backed the project first.

appreciate the engagement and looking forward to more detail as plans solidify.