$WLFI freezes Justin Sun's $107M bag with a hidden backdoor.
He complains, so they sue him for defamation, claiming he tanked the token price.
Meanwhile, they are using 5B of those same tokens to borrow $75M from a lending platform co-founded by their own CTO.
World Liberty Financial (wlfi.one) WLFI Preisverlauf USD
Besitzen Sie WLFI jetzt
Kaufen und verkaufen Sie WLFI einfach und sicher auf BitMart.Verdienen
Setzen Sie Ihre ungenutzten Kryptowährungen ein und erzielen Sie passives Einkommen durch Ersparnisse, Staking und mehr.World Liberty Financial (wlfi.one) X Insight
🔷️ 🦅 #WLFI lock proposal passes with overwhelming majority.
✍️ World Liberty Financial ( @worldlibertyfi ) Initiative’s proposal to lock 62.2B $WLFI tokens has been approved by an overwhelming majority. ⚡
✔️ This move strengthens long-term commitment within the ecosystem and helps create a more controlled supply structure. 📊
‼️ Not financial advice.
#CryptoNews #DeFi #WLFI #CryptoMarkets
I read the $WLFI vs. Justin Sun complaint so you don’t have to. A few points from the filing stand out:
According to @worldlibertyfi, Sun’s entity acquired roughly 4B $WLFI across multiple rounds, with the non-transferable nature of the tokens disclosed in the sales terms, the smart contract, and the Token Unlock Agreement.
He personally signed the agreement granting $WLFI discretion to freeze or restrict wallets, which is the same clause later described publicly as a “backdoor.”
The complaint also includes documented legal threats and a coordinated public campaign following the freeze, alongside disputes around trading activity and token exposure.
Based on the filing, this appears less like an unexpected rule change and more like a conflict over terms that were already defined and agreed upon.
