Memento (DEXTF)

Market phases influence sentiment more than they change fundamentals.

What stands out is the team’s consistency. $DEXTF

The same execution pace, focus, and discipline that guided the project during stronger market phases Is still in place today.

What shifts is the environment around it, and with that, perception.

This dynamic is visible across the entire market.

Macro pressure amplifies emotions, even among the largest players.

In moments like these, attention naturally shifts from long-term construction to short-term signals.

From my perspective, this is the phase where consistency matters most.

Building quietly, staying aligned with the original vision

And keeping execution steady tends to define outcomes over time more than any single market move.

That’s why open dialogue matters.

The upcoming AMA is the right place to align expectations, share context, and address questions directly.

What do you most want clarity on going into the next phase?

One thing I’ve learned watching this space is that not every project moves at the same pace.

Some grow fast because they live on attention.

Others grow steadily because they are built around real responsibilities. $DEXTF

@Memento_Bc clearly belongs to the second group.

When you build for institutions, progress shows up quietly:

Relationships form, systems get tested, workflows start running.

It’s not always visible day to day, but it compounds.

What matters is that real funds are moving on-chain, real operators are engaging

And the infrastructure is being shaped for long-term use.

DAMA 2 and Project Compass sit exactly in that space.

All already functioning within Memento’s stack

Now extending from asset managers to fund administrators.

In markets, patience tends to favor systems built for continuity.

That’s how lasting systems emerge.

And as a community, the real edge is recognizing that kind of progress while it’s still unfolding.

Fund Management 3.0 is one of those labels that sounds trendy

Until you look at what it actually changes. $DEXTF

What changes is the operating model.

Funds move from layered workflows to a single, programmable stack

Where issuance, servicing, settlement, and reporting live on the same rail.

➡️When the logic is onchain, coordination becomes simpler.

➡️Processes become measurable in real time.

Institutions keep governance where it belongs, while the heavy lifting becomes automated.

This is the lane @Memento_Bc is building into.

Onchain fund infrastructure designed for production environments

Where the workflow matters as much as the technology.

My take: the next phase won’t be driven by “tokenization headlines”.

It will be driven by systems that stay usable when the volume, oversight, and responsibility show up.